tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498062.post115785885010805122..comments2023-08-07T03:28:04.333-04:00Comments on Opinionade: A mailbox of muckCharleshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04343869580416843625noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498062.post-1158014410995210382006-09-11T18:40:00.000-04:002006-09-11T18:40:00.000-04:00Diamondstone's mail seems to at least be talking a...Diamondstone's mail seems to at least be talking about issues like smoking ban--negative for a reason--this just seems like a blatant assault on Diamondstone that has nothing to do with the issues..Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498062.post-1158012227978569002006-09-11T18:03:00.000-04:002006-09-11T18:03:00.000-04:00I didn't say it was illegal, I said it was sleazy....I didn't say it was illegal, I said it was sleazy. A politician who does sleazy things that are within the law does not impress me. And the difference between smearing your opponent in an ad campaign and making an anonymous post to a blog is so huge that it seems ridiculous to even compare the two.Charleshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04343869580416843625noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498062.post-1158008877956688182006-09-11T17:07:00.000-04:002006-09-11T17:07:00.000-04:00New York State law does not require political camp...New York State law does not require political campaign material to list a "paid for by" attribution.<BR/><BR/>This is the result of a court decision in 1974-75 which held that anonymous speech was an important component of free speech.<BR/><BR/>Since you don't require that we posters identify ourselves either, you consciously or unconsciously seem to agree with that court decision.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com